U.N. asks World Court to give opinion on Israel's occupation

General Assembly asks the ICJ for advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation, settlement and annexation and adoption of discriminatory legislation and measures .
Reuters|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The 193-member United Nations General Assembly on Friday asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to give an opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem - areas the Palestinians want for a state - in a 1967 war. It withdrew from Gaza in 2005, but, along with neighboring Egypt, controls the enclave's borders.
    4 View gallery
    UN General Council
    UN General Council
    UN General Council
    (Photo: EPA)
    The Hague-based ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the top U.N. court dealing with disputes between states. Its rulings are binding, though the ICJ has no power to enforce them.
    The request for a court opinion on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was made in a resolution adopted by the General Assembly with 87 votes in favor. Israel, the United States and 24 other members voted against, while 53 abstained.
    "No international body can decide that the Jewish people are 'occupiers' in their own homeland. Any decision from a judicial body which receives its mandate from the morally bankrupt and politicized U.N. is completely illegitimate," Israel's U.N. Ambassador Gilad Erdan said in a statement ahead of the vote.
    4 View gallery
    גלעד ארדן
    גלעד ארדן
    Gilad Erdan
    (Photo: AP)
    Israel's former Prime Minister Yair Lapid - who was replaced on Thursday by Benjamin Netanyahu - last month urged world leaders to oppose the move, saying that bringing the matter to the court would "only play into the hands of extremists".
    The Islamist group Hamas took over Gaza in 2007 after a brief civil war with more moderate Palestinian rivals. Hamas and Israel have since fought three Gaza wars.
    Palestinian U.N. envoy Riyad Mansour noted that the vote came one day after the swearing in of a new hard-right Israeli government that promises to expand Jewish settlements and pursue other policies criticized at home and abroad.
    4 View gallery
    Palestinian U.N. envoy Riyad Mansour
    Palestinian U.N. envoy Riyad Mansour
    Palestinian U.N. envoy Riyad Mansour
    (Photo: AP)
    "We trust that, regardless of your vote today, if you believe in international law and peace, you will uphold the opinion of the International Court of Justice when delivered and you will stand up to this Israeli government right now," Mansour told the General Assembly.
    The U.N. General Assembly asked the ICJ to give an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's "occupation, settlement and annexation ... including measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures."
    4 View gallery
    מעלה אדומים התנחלויות התנחלות סיפוח
    מעלה אדומים התנחלויות התנחלות סיפוח
    West Bank settlement
    (Photo: AFP)
    The U.N. resolution also asks the ICJ to advise on how those policies and practices "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what legal consequences arise for all countries and the United Nations from this status.
    The ICJ last weighed in on the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in 2004, when it ruled that an Israeli separation barrier was illegal. Israel rejected that ruling, accusing the court of being politically motivated.
    The Palestinians on Saturday welcomed a vote by the United Nations General Assembly to ask the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
    "The time has come for Israel to be a state subject to law, and to be held accountable for its ongoing crimes against our people," said Nabil Abu Rudeineh, spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
    9Comments
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    8.
    UNGA VIOLATES ITS OWN CHARTER
    By turning to the International Court of Justice, the General Assembly of the United Nations violates its own charter, in particular article 80. Article 80 specifies that the United Nations takes over in full all decisions and resolutions of its predecessor organization, the League of Nations, including the Mandate for Palestine, passed in July 1922, which gave the Jewish people ,“for reconstituting their national home”, the territory from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River, including the whole of the city of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, Gaza and the Golan Heights, territory which by the way have never belonged to Syria. Article 80 was introduced into the United Nations Charter thanks to the initiative of a group of people including the historian Benzion Netanyahu; yes, indeed Bibi's father. Did you ever hear Bibi talk about Article 80? Indeed, never! So a stubborn refusal to defend the State of Israel in international law! And why???
    FO| 12.31.22
    42
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    7.
    Recovered, Not Occupied
    The West Bank was RECOVERED from Jordan, the invader, in 1967, it is not occupied.
    Dennis | 12.31.22
    11
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    6.
    What are "Palestinian territories"?
    The article states: "to give an opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.". Where those territories are and why are they "Palestinian"? (Not Russians, for example). And if some court consider certain land belonging to someone a priori, without any reason, - how legitimate and unbiased could be it decision?
    Gene| 12.31.22
    12
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    Load more talkbacks
    ""