High Court overturns ban on surrogacy for same-sex couples, single men

Several sections of current law, which justices called 'continuous, grievous human rights violation,' will be revoked within six months; openly gay health minister says ministry will uphold verdict 'to the letter,' praises decision as 'historic day for Israel's LGBTQ+ community, society as a whole'
Gilad Morag|Updated:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The High Court of Justice on Sunday overturned a ban on surrogacy for same-sex couples and single men, ruling that the change must take effect within six months.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • The judges found that several sections of the current law discriminated against same-sex male couples and single men and ordered that they be revoked and replaced with new clauses devised by professionals at the end of a deliberation period.
    2 View gallery
    מחאת הקהילה הגאה באר שבע
    מחאת הקהילה הגאה באר שבע
    Members of the LGBTQ+ community protest in Be'er Sheva for surrogacy rights in 2018
    (Photo: Reuters)
    "It is impossible to come to terms with this continuous, grievous human rights violation caused by the existing arrangement," the five justices wrote in their ruling.
    Ahead of the hearing, Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz — who is openly gay — told the High Court last week it was impossible to amend the law and open up surrogacy to LGBTQ+ couples under the current political circumstances.
    "The chance of amending the law in the current Knesset is nearly non-existent," he wrote to Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, asking the court to rule on the matter.
    Following the health minister's petition, the court unanimously ruled to "abolish the definitions that completely exclude from the surrogacy arrangement single men and spouses of the same sex — i.e., the definition of 'intended parents', 'intended parents who are spouses' and 'single intended mother' — while interpreting the other provisions of the arrangement in accordance with the criteria outlined in the partial judgment and the presumption that any piece of legislation seeks to promote human rights and not infringe on them."
    Israeli LGBTQ+ rights groups celebrated the High Court's historic and long-awaited ruling that has come in at the tail end of a decade-long political battle to push the amendment through the legislature.
    2 View gallery
    ניצן הורוביץ בבמה המרכזית במצעד הגאווה
    ניצן הורוביץ בבמה המרכזית במצעד הגאווה
    Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz speaking at the Tel Aviv Gay Pride Parade last month
    (Photo: Moti Kimchi)
    Horowitz said Sunday that his ministry would uphold the verdict "to the letter," praising the court's decision as a "historic day for Israel's LGBTQ+ community and Israeli society as a whole."
    "The right to equality and the right to parenthood have been given the place they deserve in the critical issue of starting a family. Discrimination against same-sex male couples and single fathers will cease. This was a years-long violation of Israel's core values," he said.
    Foreign Minister Yair Lapid also welcomed the verdict, writing on Twitter that "being a parent is a basic human right, making this a deserved moral and social decision."
    Leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party Aryeh Deri wrote on Twitter that the court's decision was another serious blow to Israel's Jewish identity and that "most of the nation desires safeguarding the tradition of Israel, preserving Jewish family values."
    First published: 13:15, 07.11.21
    7Comments
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    6.
    Surrogacy is a human rights violation for women and children
    No one should have babies with surrogate mothers from the third world. Commercial surrogacy is practically human trafficking. The primal wound will exist in all these children. Surrogacy is the abuse of womens bodies and the rights of children- for commercial gain for the fantasy of biobabies.
    Alix| 07.12.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    5.
    Activist court
    No reason this shouldn’t be banned. It’s perfectly fine for a society to have moral standards even is some people don’t like it. In fact, if a society does not have a moral structure, it will soon go down the toilet Western Europe went down that path already and succumbed to to radical Islam. If you don’t have values, you will be taken over by someone who does, and who will be very nasty to you
    David| 07.12.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    4.
    Not such happy news
    First, babies are not commodities to be bought or sold. It has nothing to do with being anti gay and everything to do with the shocking and cruel industry in the baby trade. Poor women, abused women, are often forced by husbands or families to do this, to bear a child for whoever is prepared to pay for it, then have a living being torn away immediately can have lasting mental damage. It's fine to have an arrangement based on altruism: a family member or friend willing to help. Most of the countries who allow it - and many (including liberal Sweden!) do not, because of the cruelty once it became a money-making industry - but to exploit poor women in this way is nothing more than cruelty. Whoever objects to this as an objection has not done nearly enough research into this ugly business. For this reason alone, I am against ALL surrogacy except as mentioned previously: purely on an altruistic basis and not as a business. None of these "proud" parents give a single thought as to what goes on behind the scenes.
    pgr| 07.11.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    Load more talkbacks
    ""