IDF offensive in Jenin provides temporary fix only

Opinion: As long as the PA is unable or unwilling to assume responsibility over Jenin and Nablus areas, Iran and its proxies will fill the vacuum after Tehran decided to adopt an offensive strategy in the West Bank
Avi Issacharoff|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

live
IDF operates in Jenin in counter terrorism offensive

It is very doubtful that the IDF counter-terrorism offensive on Jenin on Monday will provide a much-needed response to the uptick in violence in the northern West Bank and would likely only act as a temporary fix. Clearing the area from terror cells would last for weeks or months at best, but without the Palestinian Authority stepping in to assume responsibility, Israel may find itself launching another operation, before too long.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Tiktok >>
Read more stories:
That is the crux of the problem for security forces, which is growing daily. The PA is absent in the area. It cannot and will not be responsible for events in it, allowing Iran and its proxies to step in to fill the vacuum.
5 View gallery
ג'נין
ג'נין
An explosion outside a mosque in Jenin as IDF troops operate in the city on Monday
(Photo: AFP)
This is no longer the familiar Iranian standard of operation to limit its involvement to financing local militants. Iran has provided funding to the Palestinian terror groups since the establishment of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and later the Hamas terror organizations. Tehran has known how to pad those groups with cash and often provide training for their members, in order to bolster attacks against Israel.
5 View gallery
IDF counter-terror offensive in Jenin on Monday
IDF counter-terror offensive in Jenin on Monday
IDF counter-terror offensive in Jenin on Monday
(Photo: AFP)
But in recent months there has been a shift. Iran had decided to increase pressure on Israel, perhaps in response to alleged Israeli operations on Iranian soil, and to the strikes against Iranian targets in Syria. Tehran saw that only a concentrated effort to launch terror attacks against Israelis can bring about change, as opposed to international terror strikes that result only in newspaper headlines and opted for an offensive.
5 View gallery
מנהיג חמאס איסמאיל הנייה בהשבעתו של ראיסי
מנהיג חמאס איסמאיל הנייה בהשבעתו של ראיסי
Hamas leader Ismail Haniye attends the inauguration of Iranian president Raisi
(Photo: EPA)
Signs on the ground have been evident in the past few months indicating Iranian involvement in terror strikes meant to destabilize the West Bank. There is no one commander in this effort, unlike past occurrences when the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps' Quds force had taken the lead in Palestinian operations. Now multiple Iranian organizations are competing for the lead, providing funds, but also weapons and explosives as well as intelligence and technology.
Mostly these are smuggled across the Lebanon-Israeli border, using drug smugglers who hide explosive material among their products. Sometimes more considerable smuggling operations are made.
Smuggling also occurred across the Syrian border with Israel, but IDF security measures there are harder to circumvent as civilians rarely approach the frontier and the Syrian military has thus far avoided providing its assistance to such efforts, likely understanding the potential Israeli response.
Recently smuggling efforts were made across the Jordanian border, primarily where the borders of Israel, Jordan and Syria meet. An Iranian operative who fails to transport weapons through Lebanon can try his luck in Syria and if that too fails, he can try the Jordanian border as well.
Israeli security officials are concerned that drones may be used to smuggle weapons into the West Bank. This would be an inexpensive method but would entail only small although lethal shipments of arms due to weight restrictions.
The explosive device detonated near Meggido last March was carried out with the full knowledge of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group in Lebanon, and according to officials, was approved by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah himself.
5 View gallery
המעצר
המעצר
Palestinian man arrested after placing an explosive device on the road near Megiddo last March
Although an apparent development in the efforts to attack Israelis, the officials said Nasrallah was not interested in all-out war with Israel. His working assumption is that an IED on the side of the road in Israel would not prompt an Israeli offensive and if one is launched, it would be limited to a number of days because of his ability to effectively strike Israel's home front with his missiles. He also hoped that since a Palestinian terrorist was dispatched on the mission, Israel would not be able to trace it back to him.
So why did Nasrallah approve the operation, to begin with? The answer is his likely capitulation to Iranian pressure to join the efforts in the fight against Israel. Even what has been seen as Hezbollah's recent provocation, setting up tents in Israeli territory, appears to be a dud. It was likely not an operation planned in Beirut but rather a mistake in location on the ground which both Israel and Lebanon have been trying to resolve peacefully.
5 View gallery
ג'נין
ג'נין
IDF forces in Jenin on Monday
(Photo: EPA)
Now, the Palestinian arena around us has become Iran's favored playground. As long as the PA remains absent in Jenin, Nablus, and the like and while Israel avoids taking control of those areas permanently, there may be no long-term solution to the security challenges there.
3Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
2.
We can see what Palestinian thinkers have been saying for ye
That TWO Palestines one in Gaza and the other in the West Bank won't ever work. Any Palestine in the West Bank is irreconcilable with Israeli need to secure its vulnerable centre. Any analysis shows that ONE UNITED Palestine in an expanded Gaza alongside Israel and Egypt within mutually secure borders is the surest way to statehood, stability and prosperity. Who wants a festering cesspool in the West Bank when we can build gleaming brand new Jenin in Gaza!
Sammy| 07.03.23
20
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
1.
Professor of Economics, International Affairs and Law, GWU.
Israel is facing a classic war game scenario. Clearly, the current action, at best, will result in a temporary respite. The search for a permanent solution has a number of hard options. (a) occupy Jenin – not a good idea; (b) transfer the young population and their entire families that are involved in terrorism out of Jenin, either to Gaza or to the Hashemite Kingdom of Palestine – the Turkish solution in Cyprus – good solution and (c) change the PA leadership and force the new leaders to change their education system and philosophy towards Israel and the Jews, in order to improve their own lives. The latter option is a major stretch but must be done. It can be done by halting EU, US and UN money including money coming in from their NGOs. If and only if these sources of funds actively run the local schools in the disputed territories, with Israeli oversight, they cannot be allowed to send money into the territories. Likewise, the Israeli government must disgorge the money going to families of terrorists. The latter decision is not a political decision, it is existential.
Joseph Pelzman| 07.03.23
20
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Good Ideas
I agree with your solution B and C.
אברהם דו פרי| 07.03.23
10
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
""