The Israeli informant who spread lies about Joe Biden and his son, and started an impeachment inquiry

Alexander Smirnov told the FBI that the president and his son demanded a $10 million bribe from a Ukrainian energy firm in order to safeguard it from a criminal probe and Republicans used this to initiate an impeachment inquiry against Biden, but it has now emerged Smirnov concocted the tale because he hates the president
Tzippy Shmilovitz, New York|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Federal law enforcement has warned that Alexander Smirnov, an Israeli citizen and previous FBI informant now indicted for concocting corruption claims against President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, is spreading new falsehoods that jeopardize the upcoming U.S. elections. This comes after Smirnov reportedly had meetings with Russian intelligence officials.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
Read more:
Information from the U.S. Department of Justice reveals that Smirnov, who is accused of delivering deceptive and damaging information about the president and his son during FBI interviews, admitted to having very recent and extensive interactions with foreign intelligence officials.
3 View gallery
(PHOTO: gettyimages, AFP)
An assertion for pretrial detention for Smirnov, submitted by the office of Special Counsel David Weiss, maintains Smirnov has connections with various foreign intelligence agencies and had intended to exit the U.S. just two days after his arrest last week.
Following said arrest, Smirnov disclosed to law enforcement that Russian intelligence-associated officials had a hand in circulating a story about Hunter Biden, as stated by the prosecutors.
The court documents further state that Smirnov has acknowledged having several interactions with a Russian intelligence official. This official is characterized as a former Russian government official's son, someone with command over two groups assigned to execute assassinations in a foreign nation, a Russian delegate to another country, and a person linked to a specific Russian intelligence agency.
Prosecutors have noted that Smirnov's projected travel was intended for informal talks with Russian intelligence officials, among others. They caution his attempts to disseminate misleading information about the president are persisting.
Prosecutors assert that Smirnov "is not limiting his disinformation to the 2020 election. After a rendezvous with Russian intelligence officials in November, he is energetically advancing fresh falsehoods that could influence upcoming U.S. elections." They add that, given this situation, there's a significant danger of him fleeing to evade responsibility for his deeds.
On one occasion, Smirnov asserted that Russian intelligence officials, operating from a "club" inside a hotel, had intercepted multiple calls made by high-profile U.S. individuals. These intercepted calls could serve as potential 'kompromat' for the Russian government in the 2024 election, contingent upon the chosen candidates.
3 View gallery
ארה"ב אלכסנדר סמירנוב אזרח ישראלי שיקר ל FBI הניע חקירת הדחה נגד ג'ו ביידן הוא השמאלי בתמונה
ארה"ב אלכסנדר סמירנוב אזרח ישראלי שיקר ל FBI הניע חקירת הדחה נגד ג'ו ביידן הוא השמאלי בתמונה
Smirnov emerges from the probe
(Photo: AP)
Tuesday's filing further enumerates several other purported meetings and details of Smirnov's encounters with Russian intelligence officials. Prosecutors stress these meetings are far from innocuous.
Alexander Smirnov has been indicted by a grand jury for supposedly making false accusations to FBI agents in June 2020. The accusations revolve around his alleged interactions with an executive from Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company where Hunter Biden served as a lawyer before joining its board.
Smirnov is alleged to have informed the agents that Burisma's executives confessed to hiring Hunter Biden with the intention of shielding themselves from various issues involving his father.
Furthermore, Smirnov is accused of alleging that both Joe and Hunter Biden received payments of $5 million from Burisma's executives during Joe Biden's vice presidency. This was supposedly part of an effort to resolve problems arising from a criminal investigation into Burisma and Ukraine.
Smirnov spun a yarn to the agents, suggesting Burisma's higher-ups confided in him that Hunter Biden's appointment was a shield against troubles, courtesy of his father's influence.
These allegations have been thrust into the limelight, featuring in unverified assertions by Republican Congress members amid an impeachment probe into President Biden.
3 View gallery
האנטר ביידן
האנטר ביידן
Still under the microscope, Hunter Biden
(Photo: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)
Last week, Hunter Biden's legal team contended that Smirnov's fabrications were an attempt to throw a wrench into what was supposed to be a plea deal between the president's son and federal prosecutors in the previous year. They described his statements as leading U.S. officials down a "rabbit hole of lies."
The office of Special Counsel David Weiss is at the helm of concurrent criminal proceedings against Hunter Biden, who is up against a trio of charges related to illegal firearm acquisition and possession, alongside nine tax-related accusations. These stem from an alleged evasion of $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. Hunter Biden has entered a plea of not guilty on all counts.
4Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
4.
Prosecutorial tricks and political cover
This sounds similar to the perjury trap strategy used when federal prosecuters don't have a case to convict someone they want to imprison, they might ask the same question several different ways over time during sworn testimony such as depositions. Anything that might be construed as conflicting testimony could potentially rack up decades in prison. As well, it is a crime to lie to law enforcement but it's not illegal for LEOs to lie to a suspect. The FBI has been known to leak a bs story to the press as an "anonymous source," then justify launching an investigation based on whatever scandel the echo chamber talking heads are publicly blathering about. In this case it seems likely that someone with juice got the idea to burn a long time informant for political cover, whether it was for themselves or as an act for "the cause."
Bob Watters| 02.26.24
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
3.
Russian collusion
Hm... The FBI, Russia, collusion, election interference... Where have we heard that before? Oh, during the 2015 election against Trump. It was debunked when the Mueller investigation, which was supposed to nail Trump to the wall, came up with absolutely nothing. Weiss, the guy who tried to cut Hunter Biden loose with an unheard of, super sweet plea bargain when anyone else would be swiftly be slammed into prison, until the judge squelched it. There's something called the first amendment, which the left finds troublesome - "misinformation" and "disinformation" is speech the left doesn't like and unconstitutionally tries to prosecute people for, this isn't the first time. Furthermore, if the left accusses someone of anything from bigotry to election interference it's a sure indication they are very busy doing it themselves and they aren't above doing a frame job. As well, the subject in the story couldn't have "invented" the multi million dollar Burisma and the Bidens story, it's been out and around for a long, long, long time.
Max| 02.22.24
21
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
2.
When you admit that media.....
....is bought and paid for. Is this the post for letting us go into rafah?
Eli| 02.22.24
11
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Load more talkbacks
""