Russia says Israeli minister's nuclear remark raises 'huge number of questions'

Moscow says Amichay Eliyahu's comment seems to acknowledge Israel possesses nuclear arms and questions absence of UN inspection
Ynet, Reuters|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Russia's foreign ministry said on Tuesday that a remark by an Israeli junior minister who appeared to express openness to the idea of Israel carrying out a nuclear strike on Gaza had raised a "huge number of questions."
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
More stories:
"This has raised a huge number of questions," Maria Zakharova, Russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman, was quoted as saying by state RIA news agency. "Question number one - it turns out that we are hearing official statements about the presence of nuclear weapons?" Zakharova said.
2 View gallery
שר המורשת עמיחי אליהו
שר המורשת עמיחי אליהו
Amichay Eliyahu
(Photo: Shalev Shalom)
"If so," she said, "then where are the International Atomic Energy Agency and international nuclear inspectors?"
Israel does not publicly acknowledge it has nuclear weapons though the Federation of American Scientists estimates Israel has about 90 nuclear warheads. It is not a signatory of the UN non-proliferation agreement or subject to inspections of the IAEA.
Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu remarked in a radio interview on Sunday that dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza was "one option." He also asserted there were no uninvolved civilians in Gaza.
His comments sparked an immediate backlash, which led Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to promptly suspend Eliyahu from Cabinet discussions indefinitely.
However, there is no provision for suspending a minister under Israeli law. In fact, just hours after the prime minister's statement on Eliyahu's suspension, the minister took part in a ministerial vote concerning the extension of the Justice Ministry's authority over specific decisions related to the war.
On the heels of public furor, the far-right minister later qualified that his remark was a "metaphor."
2 View gallery
מסיבת עיתונאים
מסיבת עיתונאים
Benjamin Netanyahu
(Photo: Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)
Netanyahu did not fire the minister, a step he was authorized to take, likely due to political considerations aimed at preserving his coalition. This decision came despite widespread criticism, including a statement from the United States labeling Eliyahu's remarks as "deplorable."
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said on social media platform X on Monday that, "The UN Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency must take immediate and uninterrupted action to disarm this barbaric and apartheid regime. Tomorrow is late."
Syria said Eliyahu's comments and Israel's bombing in Gaza were proof of the "terror, racism and cruelty" of Israel.
Jordan said it condemned the "racist, inflammatory and provocative statement." "This is a call for genocide and an intolerable hate crime," the Jordanian Foreign Ministry said.
Saudi Arabia condemned Eliyahu's statements and criticized Netanyahu's inaction in not dismissing him. Additionally, an Egyptian parliamentarian warned that an Israeli minister's declaration suggesting that Gaza should be erased and replaced with Jewish settlements might escalate to threats against other Arab countries.
10Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
10.
Excessive Force
Yes many questions need to be asked and the first one is Why is it ok for Russia and Putin to use excessive force in dealing with Chechen terrorists at Beslan? Killing 180 people including children The second is Why was it ok for Russia to use Excessive force and narcotic gas In the Dubrovaka Theatre Siege when 170innocent people died ? The issue for israel is Hypothetical The issue for Russia is that it happened
Joe| 11.07.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
9.
Already woefully behind Hamas in Hasbara,
With the least aware, most doctrinaire government in the history of the state, of course, Bibi's crew would broadcast Israel's purported Nuclear option" and open yet another avenue for targeting Israel as the aggressor in the justified war against terrorism. Be aware that Israel has NEVER been able to carry military action to completion. The clock is ticking for all to see!
David Turner| 11.07.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
8.
Oh no! Russia is concerned about some 'inspections!'
Then why did Putin just walk away from the nuclear treaty? I guess we're not allowed to ask the Russian Foreign Ministry why Russian forces are in Ukraine, right?
David| 11.07.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Load more talkbacks
""