Israel advances plans for new Jewish East Jerusalem neighborhood

Planned Givat HaShaked neighborhood is the newest addition to a cluster of Jewish projects on the southern edge of East Jerusalem labeled as 'settlements' by Palestinians and rights groups
Associated Press, Ynet|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Israeli authorities on Monday advanced a plan to build nearly 500 homes in a new Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem that rights groups say will further sever it from the nearby Palestinian city of Bethlehem and the southern West Bank.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • The planned Givat HaShaked neighborhood is part of a cluster of Jewish projects on the southern edge of East Jerusalem, many of which have already been built up into full-fledged residential neighborhoods. Critics say they further undermine any hopes for a two-state solution.
    3 View gallery
    Predominantly Arab neighborhood of Silwan, just outside the Old City in East Jerusalem, on November 9, 2020
    Predominantly Arab neighborhood of Silwan, just outside the Old City in East Jerusalem, on November 9, 2020
    Predominantly Arab neighborhood of Silwan, just outside the Old City in East Jerusalem, 2020
    (Photo: AFP)
    Ir Amim, an Israeli rights group that closely follows developments in Jerusalem, said the plan for the neighborhood was approved on Monday to be deposited for objections, a key step in a bureaucratic process that could continue for months or years before construction begins.
    There was no immediate comment from the Jerusalem municipality. City officials, who consider the projects to be ordinary Jewish neighborhoods, have previously said they are committed to building in all areas of Jerusalem for the benefit of Jewish and Arab residents.
    Israel captured the West Bank and East Jerusalem in the 1967 Six-Day War and has built settlements across both territories that are now home to some 700,000 Jewish settlers. The Palestinians want both territories to form part of their future state and view the settlements as the biggest obstacle to peace. Most countries consider the settlements to be illegal.
    3 View gallery
    Aerial view shows a Palestinian village, left, and a settlement, right, separated by the partition wall on the West Bank
    Aerial view shows a Palestinian village, left, and a settlement, right, separated by the partition wall on the West Bank
    Aerial view shows a Palestinian village, left, and a settlement, right, separated by the partition wall on the West Bank
    (Photo: AP)
    Israel annexed East Jerusalem in a move not recognized by the international community and considers the entire city its unified capital. Palestinian residents of the city claim to face systematic discrimination, especially when it comes to urban planning, making it extremely difficult for them to build new homes or expand existing ones.
    The U.S. and other Western countries have pressed Israel to rein in settlements, with little success. Israel’s outgoing government, which included dovish parties and even an Arab faction, approved the construction of thousands of settler homes despite U.S. objections.
    3 View gallery
    construction work in the Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev, near the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Ramallah
    construction work in the Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev, near the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Ramallah
    Construction work in the Jewish settlement of Givat Zeev, near the West Bank city of Ramallah
    (Photo: AFP)
    The latest project will be built adjacent to the Palestinian neighborhood of Beit Safafa, which is already mostly encircled by settlements, further preventing its growth.
    “While there’s constant investment, robust development for Israelis, there’s a complete suppression of urban planning (for Palestinians), which ultimately serves as a mechanism of displacement for Palestinians because it pushes them out of the city,” said Amy Cohen, the director of advocacy for Ir Amim. “They have no means to build or expand their neighborhoods.”
    3Comments
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    3.
    "two-state solution" is neither!
    shloime| 10.04.22
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    2.
    Build it high and build it wide
    Besides the fact that israel belongs to the Jews and we should build everywhere, the logic of the left is idiotic: Who in their right mind believes that preventing Jews from living in parts of the land and leaving it open to be taken is going to make Jews safer? If you purposely weaken yourself, this is going to protect you? Perhaps they will have sympathy on you or perhaps they will have pity on you because you’re an idiot??
    David| 09.06.22
    20
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    1.
    The AP: Jews are always 'settlers,' never residents.
    Israel does not need the world's permission to build anywhere in Israel. Period. End of story. Why does the US object to any building projects? Does Israel object to American companies building on what was native American land? Maybe it should. Dear AP, instead of using the pejorative 'settlement' to describe the construction, why not use the more factual 'neighborhood?' Or would that simple change go against your company's perpetual bias against Israel?
    David| 09.06.22
    70
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""