Pompeo: West Bank annexation is Israeli decision to make

U.S. secretary of state welcomes new gov't, leaves move to extend Israeli sovereignty to West Bank settlements in hands of Jewish state; Abbas: accords with Israel, U.S. null if Israel goes through with annexation
Itamar Eichner, Reuters|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Wednesday it was an Israeli decision whether to annex parts of the West Bank and that the United States will offer its views on this to the new Israeli government in private.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • "As for the annexation of the West Bank, the Israelis will ultimately make those decisions," Pompeo told a press conference. "That's an Israeli decision. And we will work closely with them to share with them our views of this in (a) private setting."
    2 View gallery
    מייק פומפאו
    מייק פומפאו
    U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
    (Photo: AFP)
    Pompeo also said he was happy Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and centrist rival Benny Gantz signed a deal on Monday to form a national emergency government, saying he did not think a fourth consecutive election was in Israel's interest.
    The coalition agreement states that while the new government will strive for peace and regional stability, plans to extend Israeli sovereignty to Jewish settlements in the West Bank could be promoted.
    The move would mean a de-facto annexation of territory that Israel seized in the Six-Day War in 1967 and that is presently under Israeli military control. It would have to be greenlighted by the United States, after which Netanyahu would be permitted to advance plans from July 1, the agreement says.
    The Palestinians and many countries consider settlements to be illegal under the Geneva Conventions that bar settling on land captured in war. Israel disputes this, citing security needs and biblical, historical, and political connections to the land.
    Last January, U.S. President Donald Trump presented a peace plan proposal, cited as "The Deal of the Century", at the White House in the presence of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Blue & White Chairman Benny Gantz.
    2 View gallery
    הבית הלבן
    הבית הלבן
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump during the presentation of the peace plan at the White House
    (Photo: EPA)
    Netanyahu's surroundings claimed annexation was closer than ever. However, such a move is yet to be approved by the government since, and U.S. officials have made it clear that they will oppose its execution before a new Israeli government is formed.
    After the presentation of the peace plan, Netanyahu said in a government briefing that the annexation of West Bank territories will be carried out in two steps, but a few hours later, the program's architect - senior advisor to President Trump Jared Kushner - said he did not believe the move would take place anytime soon.
    When asked whether the U.S. government supports the annexation plan, Kushner replied that the only agreement with Israel was on the establishment of a committee that will put together an orderly roadmap.
    Pompeo also said Iran needs to be held accountable for the successful launch by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps of the country's first military satellite into orbit.
    "I think Iran needs to be held accountable for what they've done. They have now had a military organization that the United States has designated a terrorist attempt to launch a satellite," Pompeo said.
    Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said in remarks aired on Wednesday that his administration would regard agreements with Israel and the United States "completely canceled" if Israel annexes land in the West Bank.
    "We have informed the relevant international parties, including the American and the Israeli governments, that we will not stand hand-cuffed if Israel announces the annexation of any part of our land," Abbas said on Palestine TV.
    5Comments
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    4.
    NETANYAHU AND GANTZ, HAVE THE GUTS TO TELL...
    If you agree that the legitimacy of the creation of the state of Israel is based on the November 1947 UNGA Resolution 181, than you have to admit what follows: that by annexing military conquered territories, as East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, Israel is violating the Forth Geneva Convention and UNSC Resolution 242. Violating the Fourth Geneva alone is already considered as a war crime. So Israel is considered as a criminal state and all those who support this state may be considered as criminals too. BUT… The truth is that UNGA 181 had no binding value as UNGA Resolutions are just proposals and never binding, but worse! Resolution 181 was a violation of the rule of Rule of Res Judicata, because exactly 25 years before, in 1922, after decisions already made earlier, at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, at the San Remo conference in 1920 (today exactly 100 years ago), the League of Nations voted, unanimously by all its 51 members the Mandate for Palestine, that gave the Jews an independent state in formation on a territory between the sea and at least the Jordan River (including even East of the Jordan if we consider that Article 25 of the Mandate became null and void 14th of May 1948) and last but not least, the Golan Heights. The Mandate for Palestine became International Law, valid to this day, can’t be rescinded and reaffirmed by Article 80 of the UN Charter. So there is no question of annexation, but imposing Israel’s laws on territories that belong under International Law to the Jewish state of Israel. Is Gantz or even Netanyahu aware of all this? And if they are, why don’t they have the guts to tell it???
    FO| 04.23.20
    40
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    3.
    The biggest favor is Trump not telling Israel what to do
    Steve Benassi| 04.23.20
    11
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    2.
    1P1V1S is the only ICC approved cure for the toxic Apartheid
    1P1V1S is the only ICC approved cure for the toxic Apartheid Kahanist One State If Jerry was or still is a Kahanist, would Kramer turn him in? Haaretz already did Giddyup
    Harry Guardino| 04.22.20
    12
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    Load more talkbacks
    ""