The war of attrition on Israel's democracy has begun

Opinion: Instead of leading, Netanyahu allowed Israel to be led into an abyss that will continue to tear apart Israeli society until a democratic consensus is reached
ByOCUaKXF_0_0_232_232_0_medium
Nadav Eyal|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The government dangled over an abyss. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu looked right and left, at Yoav Gallant and Yariv Levin. His eyes darted back and forth. Then the coalition joined hands and jumped.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
More stories:
And this time everything was captured on film. Netanyahu's nervous walk. His attempts to escape his security minister who was following him around the Knesset plenum. The heated, fierce argument between the de facto Prime Minister Levin and Gallant, who pleaded: "Give me something to work with."
4 View gallery
מפגינים ומפגינות בירושלים
מפגינים ומפגינות בירושלים
Protestor against the judicial overhaul in Jerusalem gets hit with a water cannon
(Photo: Ronen Zvulun, Reuters)
The consultations with Aryeh Deri, the phone calls, the attempt to dig out some last-minute compromise, something that could bypass the far-right faction – Itamar Ben-Gvir, Bezalel Smotrich, and Levin – that hijacked Israel's government.
Everything was clearly seen, and everyone in Israel can watch it, and historians will record and document it: This is how the very successful Israeli nation marched along an incomprehensible path of recklessness.
Netanyahu's weakness is common knowledge. He’s unable to make a real decision and fears the extremists within his coalition. He’s the only person in Israel who believes Ben-Gvir and Levin’s empty threats. The coalition is completely detached from what is happening on the streets.
And how could it not be? The prime minister, in an appalling act of neglect of Israel’s security, didn't even bother to convene the cabinet to receive an honest report from the Israel Defense Forces about the state of the military and its reserves.
Not only did he avoid doing so, but he also refused to meet with the IDF chief of staff, who requested to see him before the vote - to personally present to him the implications of the vote on Israel's readiness for war.
4 View gallery
מליאת הכנסת
מליאת הכנסת
Benjamin Netanyahu fears the extremists within his coalition
(Photo: Amir Cohen, Reuters)
David Amsalem’s poisonous populism, along with Smotrich's fundamentalism and Levin's vindictiveness, are the components that finally consumed the ethos of Israel’s security.
Lies will be told in vain. But here are some truths: Those who take to the streets to defend Israeli democracy are good, loyal citizens who are dedicated to their country and the values of Zionism. Volunteer-based reserve units can’t obligate officers and soldiers to volunteer.
These officers and soldiers enlisteded and served a Jewish and democratic state with dedication while risking their lives. However, the proposed judicial overhaul, as presented by Levin and Simcha Rothman, will turn Israel into an authoritarian state similar to Turkey.
The reasonableness standard, as Levin, Netanyahu and Ben-Gvir put it, isn’t all there is to change; other laws will follow, starting with a takeover of the judicial selection committee. At any given moment, the coalition had the opportunity to commit to passing the reasonableness clause, and any other legislation only with a wide consensus.
Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid agreed to it. Netanyahu refused. Lapid also agreed to a 15-month halt to the legislation, for the sake of finding compromise. Later, this request would be reduced to only 12 months. Netanyahu didn’t agree to anything, not really. He was afraid.
4 View gallery
בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד בהצהרה
בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד בהצהרה
Opposition Leader Yair Lapid agreed to certain conditions in order to achieve compromise
(Photo: Shalev Shalom)
Many people are now filled with despair and deep depression. To them, I say: The battle for democracy will be long and full of obstacles. This isn’t the end, it’s merely the beginning. To save democracy from those who seek to harm it, we’ll need patience, resilience, and an understanding that we won't achieve grand moments of triumph and clear victories.
What does that mean? It means delaying the next law, holding back regulations, appealing to the Supreme Court, demonstrating, compromising where possible (not compromising on democracy, but on other matters), not losing hope, and certainly not giving up on the need to persuade, discuss and reach agreements.
It took Yariv Levin half a year to pass the first law, and he passed it in such an extreme version that the Supreme Court may intervene. This delay happened thanks to the protest, the government’s foolishness, and the various Likud supporters who didn’t support the overhaul in the polls.
The IDF chief of staff, head of the Shin Bet, and Mossad chief are all committed to the rule of law in Israel, as is the majority of the public. Perhaps that will change, but there’s no point in premature despair; we should be looking to the future.
4 View gallery
הפגנה בתל אביב
הפגנה בתל אביב
Protesters in Tel Aviv
(Photo: ACK GUEZ / AFP)
There are those who push to resign from their jobs and leave the country for ideological reasons. Those who fight for the fate of a nation don’t easily give up their positions in the Knesset, the government, public service,and, yes, also in the military.
No one will pursue those who leave, moral and good as they may be; their positions will be filled shortly by regime loyalists. Transferring positions of power to those who want an anti-democratic regime change will only serve to strengthen them.
So, what’s the silver lining? History won’t remember Israelis as ones standing on the sidelines and watching indifferently while their freedoms were stolen and their democracy trampled. The solidarity forged here in recent months is the broadest Israel has ever seen in its history. A battle of attrition for Israel’s democracy has begun.
5Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
5.
Irresponsible
It’s irresponsible to call “authoritarian” a democratic process to implement a system (not even identical but just) closer to the standard systems in place in the vast majority of democracies in the world. It’s preposterous. I challenge you to cite the list of western democracies that have a reasonableness clause. I challenge you to cite the list of western democracies where the judicial system has the final say in the supreme court selection process without control from elected public officials or the public in general. Protesters are of an unbelievable ignorance, manipulated by unscrupulous public and elected officials. Even Alan Dershowitz, a prominent leftist (but impartial) jurist agrees that the current Israeli judicial system is an exception among world democracies and that, with this reform, Israel will be closer to Canada and other such leading democracies. In addition, it’s dangerous. 2000 years ago, a violent minority burned the food reserves and lead to the destruction of the 2nd Temple. 100 years ago, a violent and antidemocratic minority took over the Russian state. Today, if these lies continues, a violent minority will destroy this state. Although I’m not a supporter or the PM, for once, I commend his words : as he very well said, today as in Solomon’s judgement, there are two sides in this argument and one side is ready to cut the baby it pretends to love into pieces if it cannot maintain its undemocratic, unelected and unrepresentative minority control on the state. Either they control this state or there will be no state. It’s as simple as that. The real pro-democracy fighters are not where you think they are. We are in a fake and Orwellian world where people are the opposite of what they pretend to be. This all demonstrates how, contrary to common mediatic knowledge, since the founding of the state, the right is more democratic than the left, having prevented a civil war after the disgusting Altalena affair, after the passing of Oslo A, Oslo B and the Gaza disengagement, and lastly the sea bed disengagement to the benefit of Hezbollah last year, without any discussions or compromises, when the completeness of the Land of Israel is one of its core values. quod erat demonstrandum
Reuven| 07.25.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
4.
Then the coalition joined hands and jumped.
Good that they did! Israel is on the way to a more democratic Judicial system....like in the rest of the Western world!! Not the coalition but the hysteric anarchy of a minority group of leftist with an agenda of regime change is tearing apart & endangering the lives of millions. No normal country can allow that street mobs & army revolt will make the rules! That's called Dictatura!. Laws are made by the elected government, in the Knesset & accepted by a majority. This in contrast to the interim PM who single handed, one week before elections signed away Israel's maritime rights because of 'promises from Nesrallah,.....without any debate or vote in the Knesset. That is what's bringing Israel to the abyss...supported by the media! "In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act", George Orwell. Maybe you can start the process! Even Aharon Barak said in 2020 in front of the camera that this law is a smell unimportant law and can be abolished....today telling us something else. There is a word for it.
tiki| 07.25.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
3.
The left need to accept the election results!
I thought that elections was the democratic consensus ...
mario | 07.25.23
10
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Load more talkbacks
""