Biden mistrusts Netanyahu motives as he itches for a public fight

Analysis: President makes off the cuff comments accusing Israel of indiscriminate bombing in Gaza after PM rejects PA involvement in post war Gaza and appears to pander to far-right coalition
Sy9tn2FXY_0_0_200_200_0_medium
Itamar Eichner|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Many officials in Israel were surprised by comments made by U.S. President Joe Biden on Tuesday on the need of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to make changes in his government. Biden spoke to donners to his reelection campaign and criticized what he called indiscriminate bombing in Gaza. He said the Israelis were right about the need to eliminate Hamas but slammed Netanyahu for his positions on a 2-state solution to the conflict with the Palestinian.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
More stories:
"Israel's security can rest on the United States, but right now it has more than the United States. It has the European Union, it has Europe, it has most of the world ... But they're starting to lose that support by indiscriminate bombing that takes place," Biden said.
3 View gallery
נשיא ארה"ב ג'ו ביידן
נשיא ארה"ב ג'ו ביידן
Joe Biden
(Photo: Mandel Ngan / AFP)
The president's words reflect the deep divide between the administration and the government in Jerusalem which has emerged into public view over two points, the first being the continued war in Gaza. The U.S. want to see the veracity of the IDF operation reduced and the bombing campaign ending by early January.
Washington had not put an explicit deadline for that to happen but have made clear that Israel's time to continue the war as it has been waged, was running out and the battle against Hamas would have to be conducted with more care and precision to avoid civilian casualties.
Biden is facing a presidential election next year and the images of civilians killed in Gaza, has prompted his unusually harsh accusation that Israel was indiscriminately bombing the Strip in its war against Hamas.
But the U.S. is also looking ahead at the day after the war and was enraged by the public remarks made by Netanyahu that he would not allow the involvement of the Palestinian Authority in the management of Gaza. Netanyahu said he would not repeat mistakes made by Israel when it signed the 1992 Oslo accords that created the PA, which he said was supporting terrorists and had failed to condemn that Hamas massacre.
3 View gallery
רס"ר גל איזנקוט ז"ל
רס"ר גל איזנקוט ז"ל
Benjamin Netanyahu
(Photo: Clodagh Kilcoyne / Reuters)
The prime minister's position would prevent a two-state solution, which in the U.S. position is the only viable end to the conflict, and would also upend any chance for a deal that would normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which Biden had hoped would be his main foreign policy achievement ahead of the elections.
Amid the American pressure on Israel, no public, U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan will arrive in Israel for meetings with its leaders on Thursday, followed by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin who is scheduled to arrive next week accompanied by head of the Joint Chiefs General Charles Brown.
The administration wants to see the IDFs operational planning and influence it as much as possible. The Americans understand that in the current make up of the government, there could be no progress made on the Palestinian front which is why Biden repeated comments he had made in the past about the far-right coalition and particularly about Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who are both unwelcome in the U.S..
3 View gallery
בצלאל סמוטריץ' ואיתמר בן גביר
בצלאל סמוטריץ' ואיתמר בן גביר
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in the Knesset
(Photo: Alex Kolomoisky )
The president's seemingly off the cuff comments show Biden's frustration and concern that he is once again being misled by Netanyahu who may be seeking a public showdown.
5Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
5.
Biden lecturing Israelis about their government?
At the time of this writing Biden has something like a 31% approval and 64% disapproval rating in the US among the citizens. Politically the US citizenry is devided like not seen since the civil war 160 years ago. The government is stuffed to the gills with ideologues, grifters, the wildly incompetant, those who subvert the military, a rogue, weaponized bureaucratic element in the administrative branch. Viciously dirty politics rule the day. The Judicial branch has judges who legislate from the bench rather than apply the law. Congress engages in endless, stupid food fights. And Biden lectures Israelis about their government? He should have a look at his own front yard, some people just need to mow their own lawn.
Peter Blinkton| 12.20.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
4.
Dont let that door smack you on the way out, Joe
especially after you lose the election.
12.13.23
02
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
3.
Deja vu a la Biden Vietnam war - Israel Hamas war
There's no telling what Biden's going to say from one moment to the next. However, a look at the Vietnam war might have a deja vu vibe about how Biden might try to dictate how Israel fights Hamas... The WWII vets who became American politicians from the 1950s to the 1980s wanted wars to be limited probably because they went to war every night reliving the unthinkable horror of their years long experiences of brutal death and destruction while they slept. During the Kennedy administration the limited war doctrine was created to straddle the fence between "inglorious retreat or unlimited retaliation." The US couldn't be seen as propping up an unmitigated tyrant like South Vietnamese President Diem, so he was green lighted to be assassinated in a coup by the highest levels of the US government in late 1963. After that the US owned the outcome of the war. Three weeks later President Kennedy was himself assassinated. President Johnson may have contrived the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 in order to insert American troops to fight a war the South Vietnamese army was either unwilling or incapable of fighting on their own nor the government competent to direct. Due to the doctrine of limited war nothing about the war made sense to the military personnel who were fighting it. They were left as sitting ducks with ridiculous rules of engagement (in order to have a "humane war") in South Vietnam rather than going for the jugular in Hanoi. Having an idiot bean counter like McNamara to "scientifically" run the war largely negated the efforts of the troops. Hanoi fought much of the war not only with the Viet Cong in South Vietnam but also by manipulating American opinion with propaganda swallowed wholesale and regurgitated by much of the leftist antiwar movement, which demonstrated and rioted against the war and spit on returning soldiers while Hanoi argued whether the table was to be square or round at the Paris Peace talks rather than negotiate. President Nixon went after the NVA supply route and ammo dumps in Cambodia but was shouted out of it by public opinion. Nixon pulled the troops out and the South Vietnamese army collapsed in 1974. The antiwar activists who decried alleged atrocities by American troops on civilians didn't care the slightest about the millions of South Vietnamese civilians who were subsequently executed by the North Vietnamese after taking over the country, Some "Peace with honor," and there has been much "inglorious retreat" ever since.
Justo| 12.13.23
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Load more talkbacks
""