FDA's booster shot ruling can be seen as glass half full

Opinion: Vaccine supporters highlight FDA's mirroring of Israeli policy on the need for booster shots while opponents highlight questions of safety, especially for younger populations; government must concede vaccines alone cannot end surge
Sarit Rosenblum|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The U.S. Food and Drug Authority's (FDA's) decision on Friday to approve a third dose of the coronavirus vaccine to people over the age of 65 or to those at high risk from the virus has given ammunition for both vaccine supporters and opponents.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • Supporters highlight the fact that the FDA mirrored in its decision the policy adopted by the Israeli government late in July, and agreed that the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines wanes over time. It also indicated that booster shots will be offered to more Americans down the road.
    3 View gallery
    |
    |
    COVID-19 vaccine
    Vaccine opponents, on the other hand, chose to highlight the fact that the FDA expert panel voted almost unanimously against administering the booster shot to younger populations, including children, claiming that there was no evidence to support the need for booster shots or conclusive proof of their safety.
    The truth, as always, lies in the middle. American medical experts were not convinced of the need to roll out the third dose of vaccines and the question of their safety has not yet been determined.
    But the situation in the U.S. is different from that in Israel, both in terms of morbidity and the number of vaccines administered.
    Americans received their COVID-19 vaccines months after their Israeli counterparts did and therefore many have not yet experienced the decline in vaccine protection, negating the immediate need for a booster shot.
    3 View gallery
    מטה ה-FDA במרילנד, ארה"ב
    מטה ה-FDA במרילנד, ארה"ב
    U.S. FDA headquarters in Maryland
    (Photo: Reuters)
    In Israel, the Delta variant of COVID-19 has caused a record-breaking surge in morbidity and the time that had elapsed since most Israelis received their second vaccine dose has placed them in greater danger.
    Had there not been more than 3 million who had already been given the third dose Israel's fourth wave of the pandemic would have been much worse.
    Health officials took a certain gamble when they provided a booster shot to all age groups, but it paid off. A nationwide lockdown was averted and the number of seriously ill patients, which doubled every week at the start of the fourth wave, appears to have stabilized.
    After months of surging infections and one month since the rollout of the third jab, the positive trend that was observed shows that renewed immunity may offset the spread of the disease caused by school re-openings and holiday celebrations.
    3 View gallery
    חיסון שלישי של מד"א בחולון
    חיסון שלישי של מד"א בחולון
    Man receives COVID-19 vaccine booster shot at pop-up vaccination hub in Holon
    (Photo: AFP)
    But the fact that nearly half of all new COVID-19 cases were detected among children augurs ill for the days and weeks after kids return to school next month following the High Holidays break.
    The government must stop pretending that all is well and that it has succeeded in its policies promoting "living alongside the pandemic." It must admit publicly that the fourth coronavirus wave will be a long and hard one.
    Vaccines alone are not the solution to surging cases and more restrictions on mass gatherings must be imposed, along with more rapid testing including in schools to identify infections where they begin.
    The government must also tighten health measures at the airport and border crossings where the next new variants of COVID-19 are sure to appear and make their way into the country.
    3Comments
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    3.
    The long and short of it
    First, wrong that the numbers have stabilized. It's only the number of tests - especially over a month of "shabbats" - which show any significant reduction. And now the vaccine issue: Although a firm believer in vaccine therapies, I am now having doubts. This "vaccine" has not run the prescribed tests to determine long-term safety. Desperate governments, anxious to be seen to reduce the impact of the Covid-19 virus are following our government’s arbitrary decision on booster shots just 5 months after a second dose that was intended to consolidate its effectiveness. It’s effectiveness has, in real terms, been far, far lower than any other medication ever produced, which explains the FDA’s reluctance to approve it. This has given the green light for governments to overrule the recommendations of both the FDA and the vaccine manufacturers, for something that is valid for even less time than the full dose expected. This is authoritarianism, not democracy. More worrying should be that these new vaccines are NOT reducing the morbidity rate in any significant way, yet we’re being forced to accept that for as long as thousands of people every day are testing positive with or without the vaccine, there will be calls for more and more vaccinations in order to gain entry to any indoor spaces or being forced to undergo test after test. Even this unpleasant test clears us for no more than one day. It’s forcing more and more people to forego going anywhere if only to end to these invasive procedures. Not only do we have no guarantee of efficacy of either test or vaccine, the only impact is to encourage the virus to mutate even more in order to penetrate our immunie system. The strategies so far have proven that the only winners are the Covid-19 virus and Pfizer. So far it has barely affected the morbidity rate. Alleviation of serious Covid infection has already gone down from 90 to 70%. We have the vaccine in good faith, only to find that a few months later a booster recommendation completely invalidates your previous “vaccinated” status and you’re as much of a pariah as the completely unvaccinated. Has it made us immune? Not one bit! Herd immunity is nothing but wishful thinking in the case of this virus. The only success of the strategies to date has been to encourage people NOT to have to take personal responsibility by observing a few sensible rules to avoid contagion. For that, tens of billions of dollars have been spent on experimental vaccines with a ridiculously short term impact, no guarantee of immunity or of long-term safety. In short, we’ve lost the plot on this one. I can no longer support this government’s appalling head-in-the-sand handling of this pandemic, and one that is fast adopting the woke agenda currently wrecking western civilization No more boosters until safety and long-term efficacy of the vaccines is proven and that’s at least 2 years away.
    Disillusion| 09.20.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    2.
    Not proven safe.... that's all.
    Eli| 09.20.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    1.
    Clear like the water
    Once again, like so many others, Mrs Rosenblum has clearly explained what the current situation is and has made a clear reading of the facts. My congratulations to you and please continue to bring some clarity to this swamp of misinformation and misreading or skewed by obscure interests.
    Alejandro| 09.20.21
    00
    add comment
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""