U.S. media coverage favors the rich over the poor

The Wagners are producing wave after waves of refugees in the Mediterranean area, Africa and Central America. Their Orbans. Trumps and Lukatchenkas are creating hysteria in their populations. The perfect storm drives voters to the fascist parties. And there are no visible countermeasures against the Wagners and the brothers in the kremlin. Ukrainians and Russians aer dying every day in full speed. Let us see action from the Bidens, Macrons, Netanyahus. Why are they paid to fail us?

The article would have one believe that the writer has discovered America. Newsflash: America was NOT discovered by white European men. Newsflash: For close to 100 years American media has preferred to report on news related to the lives of fair-skinned and fair-haired White American citizens ... one study specifically looks into how American media reports the kidnapping of a blond haired female over the kidnapping of a non-blond haired female. So really it follows that the media would cover the "plight" of wealthy people over the suffering of indigents. But clearly the obvious needed to be stated again...so it is good the article is here.

The sinking submarine is covered because it is interesting. I’m sure plenty of people died in car crashes on that same day, but that’s not quite as interesting as dying 20,000 feet under the ocean when there is a race to search for them. Similarly, when those Peruvian miners were trapped and then rescued, it was also an interesting story and covered wall to wall. Those miners were dirt poor. A bunch of Pakistanis trying to smuggle themselves into Europe doesn’t do much for the average American. It not exactly enthralling. Should they cover people dying of malaria in Africa. That’s more of a tragedy, but they don’t cover things because they’re tragedies. They cover them because they’re interesting