BBC says sorry for report Israel executes Palestinians in Gaza

The British broadcaster admits not making sufficient effort to seek corroborating evidence when reporting Hamas claim that 137 Palestinians were executed since the ground offensive began
Ynet|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The BBC has issued an apology for broadcasting an unverified claim by Hamas, alleging that the Israeli army engaged in "summary executions" of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | TikTok >>
Read more:
BBC radio news bulletins reported on Hamas' accusation on Christmas Eve, and later acknowledged that the corporation fell short in making adequate efforts to substantiate the claim from the designated terror group.
1 View gallery
BBC
BBC
BBC
(Photo: Frank Augstein, AP)
The source of the story traces back to the AFP news agency, which reported that Hamas had compiled testimonies indicating that 137 Palestinians had been executed since the commencement of Israel's offensive. Notably, AFP clarified that it could not independently verify the claim.
BBC radio bulletins quoted the Israeli military stating they were unaware of the incident and emphasized that Hamas does not "value truth." Despite these counterstatements, the broadcaster deemed it necessary to issue a correction. In an official statement, the BBC acknowledged, "In overnight output [on BBC radio news bulletins] we ran a story about Hamas accusing the Israeli army of carrying out summary executions in the Gaza strip," the BBC statement read.
“This was a Hamas statement, but although the accusations were attributed and our story contained a response from the Israeli military saying they were unaware of the incident and that Hamas was a terrorist organization that did not value truth, we had not made sufficient effort to seek corroborating evidence to justify reporting the Hamas claim. We apologize for this mistake.”
This was not the first instance of the BBC acknowledging errors in its coverage of the Gaza war. Last November the network issued an apology for erroneously reporting that Israeli troops had specifically targeted medics and Arab speakers in a raid on Gaza's primary hospital, Al-Shifa.
The BBC also said it was “wrong to speculate” on who was responsible for the blast at Gaza City’s Al-Ahli Arab Hospital last October. The BBC attributed the attack to Israel.
8Comments
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
8.
Mr
See below one of my many complaints to the BBC. Their pathetic response is not worth posting here. ------------------ I am writing once again to lament the continued inaccuracy of your live coverage of the current Israel Hamas conflict. Yesterday evening -02/01/2024- I sent 3 emails to your newserror email address pointing out three errors in your posts. As all were subsequently corrected this should serve as proof (if needed) that once again the BBC got it wrong. Your 19.40 post referred to Benny Gantz as the defence minister a month or so ago. In fact he was not the defence minister then or for some time prior to that. Yoav Gallant was and is. Your 20.18 post referred to a deal to exchange an Israeli corporal for over 1000 Palestinian prisoners in 2006. While Gilad Shalit was seized in 2006, the deal and his release only occured in 2011. In your 21.54 post your correspondent Paul Adams referred to Danny Danon as Israel's ambassador to the UN. The current ambassador is Gilad Erdan. Mr Danon is a former ambassador. I received the following reply to one of my earlier complaints. "I can assure you that BBC News always aims for the highest standards when reporting, and we aim to include accurate, impartial and comprehensive information likely to be of interest to our readers." Are the latest three examples in rapid succession evidence of the "highest standards" and "accurate...information" that you claim to uphold? As your long litany of errors continues unabated it is evident that your stock responses merely serve to fob off your critics and that the BBC is incapable or unwilling to seriously address the issue. You have an entire section on " why you can trust" the BBC. Trust an organisation that continually gets its facts wrong? Your BBC verify team spends an inordinate amount of time and taxpayer's money checking on everyone else. Perhaps they should start at home?
BBC misreporting | 01.13.24
00
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
7.
Too little, too late
It’s useless unless they change their editorial line from now on
Yaakov| 01.10.24
20
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
6.
Fool me once, fool me twice.
Yes the shame is on you! It's just 'excuse' number ???????????? .....for yet another lie, another unfounded smear! Of course the BBC isn't the only one...they are in the good company of most media outlets in all it's forms. The only thing they should apologize for, is how they killed their own profession!
tiki | 01.10.24
20
add comment
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
Load more talkbacks
""