Channels

Gilad Shalit on day of his return
Photo: Gil Nechushtan
Shalit with his father
Photo: Avi Ohayon, GPO
Scene from "Prisoners of War"
Image from American show, Homeland

Israeli TV show turns real as soldier is freed

TV drama about captive IDF soldiers freed in a prisoner exchange hits a nerve with Israeli public, vulnerable over real life soldier's abduction. As the show's plot unfolds into reality with Gilad Shalit's return, lines between reality and fiction blur

An Israeli TV drama about two IDF soldiers freed in a prisoner exchange has drawn angry accusations that it scored ratings by taking advantage of the country's anguish over captive soldier Gilad Shalit.

 

Now the plot of "Prisoners of War" – which inspired the new hit American TV drama "Homeland" – has unfolded into reality.

 

Shalit returned home Tuesday in a prisoner swap with the Hamas aftermore than five years in captivity in the Gaza Strip.

 


Shot from 'Prisoners of War' show (Photo: Yanai Yechiel)

 

Scenes of Shalit's arrival could have easily been mistaken for scenes of the release of the fictional soldiers in last year's opening episode of the TV show, which is due to start its second season soon.

Cheering throngs gathered with flags and banners for Shalit, just as extras did in the TV program.

 

Banners with slogans calling for the release of Shalit looked uncannily similar to banners depicting the show's fictional soldiers. Real-life TV broadcasters presented fictional news bulletins on the show announcing the impending arrival of the POWs – the same broadcasters who later reported real news about Shalit.

 


Poster calling for release of show's fictional POWs

 

That blurring of fiction and reality provoked many Israelis – including Shalit's family.

 

"Gilad is not an imaginary (POW)," his parents said in a statement when the show debuted last year.

 

"The overuse of symbolic reality was appalling," wrote Ynet's TV critic Ariana Melamed wrote. She called the show "an unprecedented manipulation of the public's emotions."

 

'Show not based on Shalit affair'

Gideon Raff, the writer and director of "Prisoners of War," refused to draw parallels between his show and Shalit's release. He insists his show was not modeled after the Shalit affair, but was inspired by the experiences of prisoners of war who returned to Israel. He denies that he was capitalizing on Israelis' raw emotions.

 

"We've tried to make the best drama we could," he said. "We've regarded the subject with respect."

 

"Prisoners of War" follows the fictional story of three soldiers taken captive in Lebanon during a botched clandestine operation against a senior terror figure. After 17 years, Israel negotiates a prisoner exchange and the soldiers – two alive, one in a coffin – are returned to Israel. The soldiers and their families struggle to resume normal lives. Meanwhile, an Israeli official interrogates the returning soldiers, out of suspicion that they may be acting as spies for their former captors.

 

Shalit's handover (Photo: Reuters)
Shalit's handover (Photo: Reuters)
 

In a country with a military draft, people are protective and emotional about prisoners of war. Leaders have previously agreed to lopsided prisoner swaps with militant groups, much like the deal to free Shalit, arguing that they must uphold their social contract with the nation not to abandon soldiers on the battlefield.

 

There are about 400 former prisoners of war living in Israel today. A number of others are still considered missing in action.

 

For his scripts, Raff interviewed psychologists specializing in POW post-trauma and met with former Israeli prisoners of war. Some of their experiences of returning home made it into plotlines.

 

Like the fictional soldiers, Israeli POWs from the 1973 Yom Kippur War were taken to an isolated facility and interrogated about their captivity, an experience they say was demoralizing and traumatic.

 

A number of former POWs appeared in an episode depicting a support group.

 

Show rings true with POWs

Hezi Shai, who was held in Lebanon for three years in the 1980s following the first Lebanon War, said the show gives a glimpse of "what happens to (POWs) when they are back home and start to live a regular life."

 

Shalit adjusting to life at home (Photo: Avihu Shapira) (Photo: Avihu Shapira)
Shalit adjusting to life at home (Photo: Avihu Shapira)
  

"Not all of them are in good shape or have a good life," Shai said.

 

Because he was one of the last Israeli POWs to return home alive, Shai acted as a consultant to the TV show – and to the military.

 

Shai said that about a year after Shalit's capture, a military representative contacted him to ask how the army should handle Shalit's return, whenever it would be.

 

Shalit, 25, appeared gaunt and frail upon his return and his initial medical examination said he was malnourished and suffered from a lack of exposure to sun and had minor wounds from his initial capture. His father, Noam, has since said he went through a "difficult experience" in captivity. He did not elaborate.

 

The Israeli show's American spinoff, "Homeland," debuted this month on Showtime, telling the story of an American soldier released from captivity in Iraq. He receives a hero's welcome, but a CIA officer played by Claire Danes suspects him to be an al-Qaeda turncoat.

 

Despite harsh reviews, the Israeli show garnered high ratings, captivating Israelis on a vulnerable level. According to the production company Keshet, A quarter of its viewers watched the first season of "Prisoners of War," making it one of the top 10 most-watched shows of the past decade.

 

 

 


פרסום ראשון: 10.24.11, 15:04
 new comment
Warning:
This will delete your current comment