Learn from what happened to Trump and Musk, avoid a DDoS disaster

Major DDoS attack hit X during high-profile interview, exposing vulnerability of even leading social media platforms to cyber threats; incident emphasizes need for strong DDoS protection and proactive measures to prevent future disruptions

Amit Morson|
On Monday, the X (formerly Twitter) platform experienced a significant Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack. This cyber assault coincided with a highly anticipated interview between Elon Musk and former U.S. President Donald Trump, causing substantial delays and disruptions.
The DDoS attack began around 8 p.m. ET, just as the interview was scheduled to start. Users attempting to join the live stream reported being unable to access the platform, receiving error messages or timeouts instead.
2 View gallery
אילון מאסק ודונלד טראמפ
אילון מאסק ודונלד טראמפ
Donald Trump and Elon Musk
(Photo: AP)
Elon Musk, the owner of X, quickly took to the platform to inform users about the situation, stating, "There appears to be a massive DDoS attack on X. Working on shutting it down. Worst case, we will proceed with a smaller number of live listeners and post the conversation later."
Trump's team posted about the technical incident that the "interview on X is being overwhelmed with listeners logging in."
Despite the technical difficulties, the interview eventually commenced around 8:40 p.m. ET, with less than 1 million listeners tuning in. While the attack wasn’t mitigated fully, the interview continued, eventually the platform was able to sustain 8 million concurrent listeners, well under the expected crowd.
Coincidentally, Musk said prior to the broadcast that X had tested the system “with 8 million concurrent listeners earlier today.” It is not clear when the attack ended, though there are some indications that the issues ended as soon as the interview was over.
2 View gallery
X
X
X
(Photo: Kovop / Shutterstock)
A DDoS attack involves overwhelming a target server with a flood of internet traffic, rendering it unable to function properly. These attacks are typically orchestrated using a network of compromised computers which simultaneously send a massive number of requests to the target server. The goal is to exhaust the service’s resources, causing it to slow down or crash.
In this case, the DDoS attack on X was significant enough to disrupt the platform’s services for over 45 minutes. The attack’s scale and timing suggest a coordinated effort, possibly by a group with substantial resources and technical expertise.
While the exact perpetrators of the attack remain unidentified, some reports suggest that a hacking group known as Anonymous Sudan may be behind it. This group has previously targeted X and other organizations to pressure Elon Musk into launching his Starlink service in different locations. Despite their name, Anonymous Sudan operates mostly from Russia and is managed by a network of cybercriminals. Initially claiming Sudanese origins, the group’s affiliation with Russia is pretty clear and are linked to the Russian-backed group KillNet.
The implications of such attacks are far-reaching. For X, the immediate impact was the disruption of a high-profile event, potentially affecting user trust and platform reliability. For users, it highlighted the vulnerability of even the most prominent social media platforms to cyber threats.
Amir Morson Amir Morson Photo: Courtesy
In response to the attack, X’s technical team worked to mitigate the impact and restore normal operations after the attack had already begun. This involved identifying and blocking malicious traffic, changing configurations in real time, reinforcing server defenses, and ensuring that legitimate users could access the platform – this could have all been prevented had the automatic defenses been properly configured, tested and prepared for such attacks. To prevent future incidents, X may need to invest in advanced DDoS protection and testing solutions.
Adequate preparation in the age of automatic DDoS protection and mitigation requires continuously identifying and remediating vulnerabilities in deployed DDoS defenses. Instead of reacting in real-time, and suffering the consequences of disruption or downtime, like the technical teams at X, proactive vulnerability identification and remediation would have stopped the attack before it begins.
The DDoS attack on X serves as a stark reminder of the ever-present DDoS threat facing publicly assessable digital platforms. It underscores the importance of robust protection and identification measures and the need for constant vigilance to protect online services and their users.
  • Amit Morson is VP of services at MazeBolt Technologies
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram >>
Comments
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
""