Researchers try to crack how people without inner voices navigate thought

New studies suggest lack of internal monologue does not necessarily indicate reduced mental capabilities as those without inner voices may be using alternative thought processes

Studies from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States found that people without an inner voice or internal monologue performed worse on certain tasks, but this difference disappeared when they could verbalize aloud.
Aphantasia, an inability to generate mental imagery or sensory experiences like visualizations, sounds or inner speech, exists on a spectrum. It is considered a variation in human senses and thinking processes rather than a medical or psychological condition.
1 View gallery
איור דיבור עצמי
איור דיבור עצמי
(Illustration: Shutterstock)
Aphantasia research validates the experiences of those affected, countering claims that they simply cannot describe mental imagery, and studying variations in sensory imagination is important for understanding brain processes.
While inner voice and verbal thinking are common, some individuals engage in unsymbolized, conceptual thinking without an inner voice, and those without one may use alternative strategies for thought processing.
The new studies suggest that aphantasia does not necessarily indicate reduced capabilities.
This article was written in collaboration with Generative AI news company Alchemiq
Sources: Live Science, The Conversation, and Psychology Today
<< Follow Ynetnews on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram >>
Comments
The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
""