UK's PM hopefuls underscore Israel ties in effort to win Jewish vote

Both Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss promise to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions, secure a UK-Israel free trade deal and fight boycott movement; meanwhile, British Labour party appears committed to recognizing Palestine as a state
The Media Line, Ynet|
Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss are fighting for the next position as leader of the Conservative Party, replacing Prime Minister Boris Johnson in September, sparking competition from both candidates over pledging their commitments toward Israel and the British Jewish community.
  • Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

  • The winner will gain the role of prime minister of the United Kingdom until the next scheduled general election in January 2025, or until a snap election, if one is called.
    3 View gallery
    בוריס ג'ונסון ליז טראס רישי סונק סונאק
    בוריס ג'ונסון ליז טראס רישי סונק סונאק
    Rishi Sunak, Boris Johnson, and Liz Truss
    (Photo: Getty images, EPA, Reuters)
    With letters to Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), a British parliamentary lobby, both candidates have pledged to continue to grow the UK-Israel relationship.
    Liz Truss wrote, “I pledge to renew my commitment to CFI and the UK’s Jewish community … not just because of CFI’s support but because it is the right thing to do,” further promising to consider moving the British Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem if she is elected.
    Rishi Sunak declared he was “proud to be a friend of Israel and … to have served in a government that has elevated the UK-Israel relationship to its strongest position.” Both candidates went on to promise to counter Iran’s nuclear activities, secure a UK-Israel Free Trade Agreement, and maintain the 2019 Conservative Manifesto commitment to combat the anti-Israel boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement.
    Joan Ryan, UK executive director of the European Leadership Network, sees both Conservative candidates as strengthening future UK-Israel relations. Ryan said, “Liz Truss has a long history of support for Israel and the Jewish community throughout her political career,” elaborating that Truss’ dedication to cultivating the UK’s relationship with Israel has been displayed by her close relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid throughout her career as international trade secretary and foreign secretary.
    3 View gallery
    יאיר לפיד בעת פגישתו עם שרת החוץ הבריתית, אליזבת טראס
    יאיר לפיד בעת פגישתו עם שרת החוץ הבריתית, אליזבת טראס
    Yair Lapid and Liz Truss
    (Photo: Stuart Mitchell)
    Ryan commented that Truss’ work on the trade deal has changed UK-Israel relations: “We’ve moved from friendship to partnership. And I would expect that partnership to continue.”
    Speaking on Rishi Sunak, Ryan commented, “The things he has said and done have been very supportive. When he was a minister of local government, he was very solid on stopping local councils [from advancing BDS measures against Israel]. … As chancellor of the exchequer, he’s had a solid relationship with [Avigdor] Liberman,” his Israeli counterpart.
    Richard Pater, Israel director of British Israel Communications and Research Centre, agreed, saying both candidates are “solidly in the pro-Israel camp.” Pater said that Truss and Sunak had recognized the need to reach out for further trade deals with Israel.
    Dr. Toby Greene, a post-doctoral fellow at the Hebrew University’s Israel Institute, said that “the real significance of this leadership race for UK-Israel relations is what effect it will have on who will win the next general election.”
    3 View gallery
    רישי סונאק עימות עם ליז טראס 25 ביולי מרוץ להחלפת ג'ונסון כ ראש ממשלת בריטניה
    רישי סונאק עימות עם ליז טראס 25 ביולי מרוץ להחלפת ג'ונסון כ ראש ממשלת בריטניה
    Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss
    (Photo: AFP)
    Greene explained that if the general population did not like the Conservatives’ pick for PM and if the Labour party then won the next general election, it would have “a significant impact on UK-Israel relations.” Greene indicated that the Labour party appears committed to recognizing Palestine as a state, which would certainly have a disruptive effect on UK-Israel relations.
    The Labour party has a history of highly critical views on Israel and has recently faced major claims of antisemitism, tarnishing its relationship with British Jews.
    Greene added, “The relations between the Labour party and the British Jewish community were in a terrible state under [Jeremy] Corbyn. … Under the leadership of Sir Keir Starmer, the situation is much better, but the Jewish community is still aware that those currents and those trends still exist within the Labour party so that is a big worry.”
    Asked if the British Jewish vote would impact the Conservative leadership result, Greene commented that despite the community being small in number among the 160,000 Conservative Party members, there are a reasonable number of Jewish Conservatives who will have an effect on the result. Greene added, “In this leadership election, you can see this in the interviews with both candidates in the Jewish press; you can also see them writing op-eds in the Jewish press” reflecting an acknowledgment from both candidates of the Jewish community’s potential voting impact.
    Asked why it was important for the UK to further strengthen its relationship with Israel, John Ryan explained, “The UK needs Israel right now, especially post-Brexit which has magnified the relationship in terms of trade, as clearly, the UK needs to form trade deals around the globe and in the Middle East.”
    With the country in a state of political turmoil, rampant inflation, and an energy crisis exacerbated by the Russo-Ukrainian War, the Conservative candidates are looking toward Israel to deepen their trade relations in a post-Brexit epoch.

    The story is written by Isla-Rose Deans and reprinted with permission from The Media Line
    Comments
    The commenter agrees to the privacy policy of Ynet News and agrees not to submit comments that violate the terms of use, including incitement, libel and expressions that exceed the accepted norms of freedom of speech.
    ""